1. How does the term "anamorphosis" fit into Latour's argument?
2. Latour claims Holbein's painting cannot show the visible and invisible worlds in the same view point. Can this explanation of representation be applied to other differences besides issues of location of space? Does subject position (socially) have the same kind of perspective limits?
3. How do the two regimes Latour talks about differ? How does representing images of faith differ from representing images of science?
4. Latour describes key differences between the first and second regimes of representation. How does each deal with representation? How are each of these images understood from the first regime? From the second?